Hermeneutics and perpetuated regimes: how groups maintain their audience pull even after bad decisions
Regimes have lasted generations even as the norms change. Civilisations go through changes altering their moral conception. Even our modern society struggles with immoral norms and future generations will criticise us for our practices. While it would make sense for ethics to discharge a revolutionary model this is not the case. Societies persist with rebellious attitudes and periodic shifts to maintain the peace. Its evolutionary progress seeks to maintain the baby without the bathwater. The society is maintained as long as the bathwater is cleaned. Society must progress. Technology advances younger generation sympathies. Morality is always evolving. While the same intuitive chorus is recited the implemented verses switch.
Elites profoundly remain on top even when their legislative debacle facilitates immoral desperation. Making excuses and maintaining their innocence. While monarchies may topple with moral quandaries, representative democracies share blame until no one is targeted. Failed polyarchical societies demonstrate a nuanced associative innocence. If the representative is part of a larger group then it cannot be sued correctly. In this vein, even modern groups after disastrous decisions remain scot-free. Hierarchical societies place few above others. Even when others reach the top with little legacy, the elite class acts identically. The arrogance of the selected toppers relinquishes any retribution for the lower classes. As long as these norms fail to hurt them, there is no need to change them. When the poor become rich in their new lavish life it is their status that prevents the younger passion from bursting forth.
Governmental capability to rejuvenate even after horrid policy as long as the policymakers are forgotten or become massive advocates. The former tend to come and go. They pass their egregious policy and are long gone when the repercussions hit. All the apologists come to defend their honour. The latter embody flip floppers. They say one thing and switch the social grain when pressure emerges from the voting moralists. They align for their own salvation. A past crime is ignored in the face of present difficulties. While shifting agendas require a brief apology and an emotional appeal to voters. Yet whether do to voter fatigue or limited options the same hypocrites remain in the public eye innocent of any wrongdoing. Politicians with the lawmaking power remain with airtight “alibis”. Playing on people’s fears and approval caving to the people through theatrical catering is influential especially during campaigns runs.
Common sense tells the voter who is the lesser of two evils. Most voters are not voting because they especially like a candidate. It is usually because one candidate is better than another. Other times prestige and charisma captured the voter heart and sympathetic pledges heartfelt by the nation. Hope is a powerful tool and weaponised to stray the hearts of the good people. Trying to fight the good fight against the devilish character endangering society. The devilish character is not an immediate threat but a potential one, sufficient phobic warfare to undermine citizenry confidence in their own capacity. The more saviour-like the more promise in the pleading minds of the voters. The citizenry is aware of patriotic commitment and revolutionary dangers. Choosing to protest instead of revolting.
They bide their time. While the present torture was undesirable a hopeful tomorrow lay on the edge of the horizon. There is a normalcy inherited and accepting of the situation. Moral horrors are just part of the fabric of reality. A psychological assault on the innocent puppets. Norms couch reality as ideal with zero tolerance to disobey for a fantasy. Born into a system is to respect that system for acceptance. Each person has a place and that is fated with no oscillation nor overriding the norm. In maturity youthful idealists with little robotic routine and hostility for rebellious fervour challenge their stake in the world. Youthfulness brings a nuanced view to the adulthood cycle. Yet youthfulness fades into colossal routine. Lost in the circle with less passion and fortitude. The fire extinguishes waiting for the next generation to pick up where they left off. Their youthful idealism does not necessarily evaporate becoming their parents. Instead revert to adulthood with small by significant change in the long run.
Some norms are so central and uncompromisingly difficult to discharge. While others are formidably weak to overhaul attention. The lawmakers relent and maintain their monopoly. The rebellious attitude does not seek to overthrow the nasty lawmakers only for them to change the law. Yet it is on their terms. They still hold the power. The player may change but not the game. An immediate win does not instigate the victory. A battle won but the war still raging. Playing into their frame. They set the rules or accord with the generational rules. Aspects may alter in time but do not alter swiftly as expected. A lifelong fight against the system. The imperfect framework needs those with the power to slowly release it. One shot will not end the turmoil. Evolutionary ease of the burden from the powerful clutches. It is not won in a day but in a lifetime’s effort. For the next generation.
A system so complex fought so bravely for with inadequate measures needs fixing. Toppling the system undermines all the effort up until now. While much more effort is necessary, the past need not be mishandled. The correct framework is set to capitalise on the openings. The holes in the framework prevent optimal accomplishing but gets near the desired area. Loving the abstract ideal of the system as it ought to be. It comes down to impassioned youthful spirit to keep pushing forward. Predecessors will suffer for their descendants liberty. The legacy is worthwhile. Overcoming the edge is rifling through the immoral norms for the perfected society. A society in progress doing away with old issues with new ones emerging. The underlying values are combative and worth fighting for. The overuse of power and problematic decisions are bad apples of a healthy fruit tree.
Detrimental norms do little to advance society insofar as their reactionary assault is forthcoming. There is not always a regressive agenda to neglect proper association. Assurance isn’t a conductive measure. A blind promise baked in power hungry infatuation. A system honed in on producing acceptable comfort. Sufficient comfort for the masses that momentarily lapses are overshadowed by the good or bad comfort. The normalcy prides itself on content observers with minute recoil. Time passes and the public must contend with the abhorrent norm. Society persists in its comforting aura. Its habitual presence even in raw negative taste is familiar with fear of revolutionary upending. The lies and failures are reduced for the continued life free of dramatic pause.
Mistaken promotions or horrid outliers are apparently excusable. A solidified mantra beholden to a dogmatic truth with little erroneous inflection. There is always more room to improve. Perpetuated norms create conceptions that can have regressive consequences. Routines lead to little care or textual magnification ceases the constructed normalcy. Yet it is the branding and uprisings that spawn periodically. Pushing for a massive twist. The evolutionary cause begins lower and works its way up. A bottom-up paradigm for the mass surge to discombobulate the elite lawmakers to frantically alter the rule for a new norm to enter the frame. The alterable rule accomplished completes the process. As long as the elite submit to mass protest, there other affairs are irrelevant. The people's pride persists before another issue arises.
Rebellions will foster in the public psyche to push back against institutional issues. The ideal system speaks to the potentiality. Pragmatic concerns are voiced with protest. Enragement with enough torque will reach the ears of the political elite. Their response will endeavour to mark their legacy. They do care about their perceptions and their re-election campaigns. In a polarised society they may have more sway with more phobic orthodox submission but this luck will run out. A more unified society with enough care will revolt strongly. Concealed elements spread like wildfire. Denial is a temporary phase and the more evidence to prove combined with public discomfort will overthrow the governmental aspiration. Anti-establishment outliers will reign imperially with progressive results.
No comments:
Post a Comment