Dummies 101

By: Jonathan Seidel

Dishonest intellectuals: how experts push false agendas on a convincing public

The obvious centre of suspicion covers the Fauci and Hotez. Two huge names in the news. The saviours from the corona virus. Apparently the truth sayers. Yet only to find out the lies they amassed over the years. Continuing to appear on mainstream news to defend themselves. History speaks for itself. The data speaks for itself. They lied and now are trying to cover up their tracks. Yet it goes farther than that to the likes of Harris and Chomsky's dogmatic vaccination and dishonest agenda. 

Was it so crazy that Fauci and Hotez lied? No not really. While people are still struggling to accept this fact, there is ironclad proof. How could those that provided us with directions to survive the virus be evil? Why are only right wingers disputing to them? To both answers its a right wing or Russian hoax. As was Hunter’s laptop. It is always someone else’s fault. People live along political biases. If their side is attacked they defend it at all costs. The magnitude of delusion is medically tormenting. My guy does it right. Never can he do wrong. That just empowers the other side to win. It cannot be. Trump is evil, there was no FBI elements and Cuomo saved the USA. All these can be true. The polarisation does not permit such all-inclusivity. Either the left is right or the right is. Most of the time both are wrong. Politicians are wrong and the people are right. Of course Fauci was hated by democrats under Trump and then beloved under Biden. Vaccines were prohibited under Trump and compelled under Biden. It is a political game. A simulation the polarised nation readily concedes.

Polarisation explains the selectivity but it does not explain the reflective atonement. Fear of the disillusioned. There is no way that the people were duped for years. There is just no way. The government lies. The inability to formally accept the collusion and deception befitting the elite class. The elected act outside the bounds of their elected territory. People cannot accept their fate. They cannot accept their mistake. They bought in Fauci’s wordplay. They acted rigorously against others, lost their jobs for nothing. A recent study came out abrogating any effect from masks. Fauci went straight to television to flatly debunk this unanimously valid approach with dubious jargon. Many people will look and still say Fauci is correct. The immense effort actualised for an illusionary purpose stalls the ability to accept this fortune. Fauci laughs as people continue to believe his lies. Accepting the jargon nonsense of vaccine after vaccine. A never-ending cycle of control. The mainstream media propped it him up, people were enamoured by the spectacle and now cannot rebel in fear of mistake. 

The government is the biggest liar. Pathologically voiding the truth or spinning narratives to fit their agenda. The media in their corporate guise fail to denounce wrongdoing. Alongside their greedy friends, the elitist circle has long deceived the public. Yet there was a single prophet to push back. There was a group tasked to defend the people against governmental power. These prophets were philosophers. The philosopher or intellectual was the renowned thinker of the age who could stand up to the government. Such intellectuals include the likes of Hemingway, Sartre and MLK. Those respected for their voices. Voices transcending the governmental onslaught. Individuals who were sought for their wisdom. Yet these intellectuals have turned their back on the people killing the prophet.

It is important to note that many do not look to intellectuals the same way sages were approached in the past. People watch the media and assume their voices are prophetic. While this is itself a failure of society, looking to talking head teleprompters for wisdom, the startling comeback of intellectuals curiously undermine their own standing. It is possible that the decline of intellectual prowess met the dubious caricature of philosophical nonsense. Media stole the show placing Hollywood as the bona fide genuine knowledgeable. Where did all the intellectuals go? Where did the prophet go? The prophet was killed along with God. His message diminished with the death of his lord. With no message, he could no longer chastise for wrongheaded thinking. The sage archaic in the secular age. Society has reached the Hegelian pinnacle there is no need for a thinker. Philosophy is dead and derided. A waste and abstract. 

Philosophy became a study of the old. While thinkers impacted the philosophical world it is not at all clear how much effect they had on the public. Nietzsche’s ideas were used by the nazis but it is also possible they were using his books as verification for their ideas. Heidegger’s presence was incredible but his impact on the laymen was minimal. So was Sartre, Foucault and Zizek. In the philosophical world there is much to be consistent about. It also depends on their genre. Political philosophy does cross over. Many have read Rand’s objectivism and Machiavelli’s Prince. How many? Less now than in the past century. Philosophy may penetrate discourse or on the hand it may describe the reality. The question of chicken or egg is central to whether philosophers have any impact or are they experimental critics. Critics who compile their thoughts and pass them to the philosophically trained and interested. Their jargon is foreign. Messaging is abstract.  

In the past centuries, the shift in continental philosophy to more societal concerns than the metaphysical layout of the medievals found its ally in Spinoza’s Ethics. Even Kant’s philosophy hinged on more abstract criteria with some concrete platitudes. Foucault’s anti-philosophical statements are an attempt to cease the pondering of the abstract and focus on historical trends. Dissecting social and diagnosing the political picture. Derrida’s linguistics though hounded in the philosophical world for its unscientific integration, does represent a social shift. While weaponised, there are factual elements that fit into the post-WWII thinking. Foucault and Derrida were reflecting societal infestation instead of postulating their own theories. Similar to Plato’s Republic, The core of honest of introspection was a deeper dive than the political satire. A triumphant gaze into social manifestation from the outside jogging down notes and forming overarching theories. 

Relevance in the political science area dwindles. While some findings intriguing, their ideas inspirational may be less accepted. Even those who ascribe by their philosophy may only internalise the merits in an isolated study. Cute ideas but with no concrete implementation. Chomsky has been one of the most important intellectuals of the past century. His linguistic work is hailed solely in academia. While his political ideas have been recycled in the mainstream news. Viewers have latched onto his views but not everyone. Yet the question is if his views have been latched on as a thinker or as a news speaker. His books only read from his appearance on mainstream news. A reverence for an intellectual only recognised in the media outlets. He wasn’t a nobody but what was the extent of his following? Even a million is nowhere near the necessary prophetic status. He was simply a man with a vision. A vision that was accepted by others who watched him. Who could quote him for an expert opinion but only in bracketed sentences.   

The newfound prophet emerged in democratic societies. The government and free market became new gods and corporate media the new prophet. In the seventies, Cronkite was the most trusted man in America. His words reigned supreme. A model of truth. Why would the news anchors lie. Providing the bitter truth periodically. The personal face to face experience. Speaking the truth the people. Telling the news as well as other current events. A prophet was no longer necessary. The intellectual landscape long gone. The media was the people’s defence system. The system so corruptible needed media to paint out the liars. Cronkite’s anti-war sentiments brought people’s grievances to the centre. It was not only a reflection of the people but it also marked a statement for elites to watch out. No longer would the media endorse this war. A man who spoke the truth of the deathly war and echoed the honest feelings of the citizenry. Trusted for having the people’s back. For travelling to Vietnam to showcase the truth. 

Cronkite acted as a representative on behalf of the people. Journalism's purpose is to check on current events whether they be political or social. Trained in the prophetic ways to immerse oneself in the corruptible ethos and emerge victorious. A spy of sorts for the people. Media is the people’s voice for the governmental actions. A secondary defence against tyranny. Governmental officials are elected freely by the people. Yet this choice is trust. The officials once in the elite chair aren’t always stand up individuals. Media recaps their exploits and exposes the truth. Media reflects the domain between the government and the people. Between the peasants and the lords. The media is the middleman. They report on the governmental demands as well as the people’s response. Instead of direct forums, news outlets publish congressional positions on paper and on air. A flow of information that not only produces the information but does so laced with citizenry apologists. It isn’t simply the telling of ideas but the writer’s response to the governmental ideas. Reporting includes facts and opinions on those facts. 

When the media medium is corrupted by corporate power, the information passed is falsified. Yet as long as the prophets aren’t ousted as false, they can continue to speak foolishly. Spewing lies to the public. The famed protectors are really just corporate servants. They are lepers leaching onto the ballsacks of cronies. Many times slaves without much flexibility. Whether one agrees with Tucker or not, he was only able to argue against the war, once he was independent. There is a certain level of uniformity and political sidelining that evidently harms the public’s commonality. Breaking free of the corporate hold enables liberated speech. To what extent, their careers and ideologies are not meshed is questionable. Some are actually in the dark, some are compelled to save their career and others are devilish. Placing a positive spin on their cruel deception for their own victory. Pushing Russiagate was to be president and out Trump. Pushing Iraq was to enhance defence contractors and combat terrorism. Insider trading is a spell of the execution. If more can be gained on the side why not add it to the list.

Corporate media does have its singularity in mind. They honestly believe what they say. They must convince themselves they are correct. The deception isn’t always intentional but an honest reflection of two-faced hypnosis. Yet given their authentic presentation and ideological lacing, people hold fast to their claims. The audience remaining strong despite the continuous lies and false hopes. Those who have jumped shift have found new podcast platforms. With revamped prophets. The Rogans, TYTs and Daily Wire fans. The amount of content proposed by both sides grows daily. Each side pandering to their audiences. While there is more nuance than the corporate ladder. That is not to say sponsors aren’t influencing podcasts. Especially those growing rapidly. It hasn’t reached the level of corporate levels but the influence is strong. Recently, an anti-establishment song was published and gained huge buzz. The artist was targeted by record labels. Yet knowing these labels would make demands and taint his entire fluid purpose, he rejected them. These conglomerates are not honest. The safe space of Youtube and Twitter is tainted with biases and deception. It is not necessarily in bad faith but the strings are placed on the polarised public. 

With fame podcasters begin to standardise their propagandised content on loop. Yet even if they are not polarising, their monistic audience tends to hold sway to a way of thinking. Corporate media upset of their losing traction publish hit pieces on these growing bases. Jezebel attempts to kill Elijah. Sending a hoard of angry customers to hound him. The media puts up the wanted dead poster and allows their audience to go forth. The hit pieces on Rogan for promoting horse dewormer was shovelled with employees at Spotify attempting to rid him from the platform. His audience too strong. Corporate agendas are trying to remain the prophets and call others who disagree false prophets. Yet they are the real false prophets. Rich and robotic spewing nonsense to the public. Podcasters are not perfect, They are the new prophets but their prophetic canvas is divided along the asme political lines. While more populist is untrue their bases are loyal to the nuance. The symmetry between podcasts and mainstream is a sign of some bigger issue. News broken only hoping for clickbait. A good example is Breaking Points. While Saagar and Krystal do provide that non-mainstream approach. Krystal quite often presents her classy msm agenda. Comments rain in critiquing her bias. 

Smaller lesser known start ups are not always the better option. The competitive spirit in these areas on platforms that seek donations from fans does parlay with genuine interaction. Yet the growth of the platform may turn it upside down. Growing disenchanted by the same talking points. Some intellectuals do have podcasts. Sam Harris is one of them. A man revered as the successor to Hitchens. Yet the pivotal moment when everyone looked to him for guidance he demanded all get the vaccine. In the utmost corniest establishment rhetoric. Attacking those who didn’t take the vaccine failing to even credibly debate the other side. Chomsky though without a podcast did the same thing. Pressured vaccine use and democratic agenda. Chomsky also had ties with Epstein as did Dershowitz among others. Never speaking out potentially either knowing or participating. Not even the intellectual heroes nor the corporate elected can be trusted. No apologies nor repentance has emerged from them. Those with strong liberal agendas lost much of their respect. Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent is almost ironic in his own participation. He played a role in his own theory and executed it to perfection. 

Trust is scattered. Sowell is an individual who has great respect but from a more capitalist framework. Many blacks and socialists do not like him for his comments. There is no intellectual that is seen as the guy/girl to look to for guidance. Harris may have had the opportunity but he screwed it up and Chomsky’s scandals are not helping him. While they may not care, they are only supporting the demise of a local hero. A sage for assistance. Those who pushed back against the vaccines like Weinstein on significant scientific grounds were hazed and censored. No one stood for their cause. Had Harris and Chomsky stood up, a different picture may be painted. It may not have done much but doing the opposite only made it worse. It only aligned them with the elites they constantly decry.   

Liar Liar

By: Jonathan Seidel

Manufacturing consent: action and reaction

Herman and Chomsky’s indelible book on political media propaganda was a landmark in exposing the strategic deception of media outlets. It is through their corporate profiteering that they spin stories to awaken mass hysteria. Their thesis has stayed true till this day with a welcoming new craziness from the war on terror, Obamacare, Trump, Covid and now the Ukraine war. Public hysteria from media news prompts congressional action beneath the surface. 

News outlets frame news in an inaccurate ideologically motivated audience clicking methodology. Reading a heading from the New York Times about Russia automatically sparks danger in the minds of Americans. Russia is the antagonist to the US’ mission of democratic protection. It is so baked in that any action on their end is a red flag. Russia is the big bad wolf and she must be stopped. It does not matter whether or not, she is in the wrong, solely that the word Russia has power. The rest of details mean nothing. The entire Ukraine war is simplified to Russia attacked Ukraine therefore it is wrong. No context no nothing. It must have been Russia’s jealousy and arrogance to return to the USSR. Every media station brings on journalists who spew this. They present this as fact. Yet they play no footage of him actually saying that. Is that his real goal? Just take the media’s word for it. If so called journalists so it is true, it is true.     

A common line is the war is completely unprovoked. Really? Firstly, Russia was blamed for blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline. Why? It had to be Russia they are evil. There is a tendency to blame any wrong doing on Russia. Hunter Biden’s laptop Russia disinformation. Trump’s presidency, Russian agent. Russia is the American Voldemort, anything goes wrong blame Russia. A similar tactic to medieval Christian sorrows, blame the Jews. Ridding the pipeline made no sense for Russia given its advantage to Russia. The US was ousted for its nonsense months later but it finally came to fruition with Ukrainians doing it. The US government knew this but chose to blame Russia. Any easy way to raise citizen ire. They deceived the public into assuming it was the enemy in order to gain public sympathy and further the war. The ironic part of this, while there is no footage of Putin’s grand plan there is countless evidence of plans to the US planning on demolishing Nord Stream. Manufacturing lies of the enemy while shifting blame with skeletons in the closet is truly bold. 

Questioning if Russia was provoked is amazing. The US promotes Russia’s malicious attacks on Ukraine. Why are they doing this? Russia is evil. There is way more to the story. NATO promised to stay out eastern Europe and continues to breathe down Russia neck. Ukraine was off-limits but NATO did not care. This put NATO on their border. The US denies ever making this deal but there is sufficient archive transcripts that say otherwise. Putin made his concerns known during Bush’s presidency. The Ukrainian coup in 2014 was assisted by the CIA. The west’s interest in Ukraine was affirmed on air to steal Russia’s robin. American is funding militias to overpower the pro-Russia government for pro-American government. The US was expanding its hegemony alongside NATO to Russia’s border. Crimea was an attempt to maintain the pro-Russian faction of Ukraine. The western side may have wished to be liberalised but not the entire country. Thus un-ironically the first treaty with Ukraine which the US forced Ukraine to reject was to give over the Donbas region and cease NATO alliance. Not the greatest deal but one that in Russia’s mind protected its self interest. 

From this explanation alone along with the exuberant amount of evidence is somehow ignored. The media from the government down portrays this conflict as good versus evil. Russia is out for blood and the US are the liberators. This is an age-old narrative. There is an evil in the world and America needs to stop it. Whether it be nazis, Japanese, communists, muslims and so on. While the nazis are in a class of their own even Japanese were not unprovoked. Japan was at war with China and America supplied them with arms even more so using economic warfare to provoke an attack. Roosevelt’s administration sanctioned the Japanese while assisting the Chinese in their war. The Japanese were stuck and attacking the US was the sole option to stop their influence in the asian region. Apparently more evidence points to intelligence knowing of the attack on pearl harbour but allowing it to produce patriotism. Did this account for two atomic bombs? Communists and muslims were easily branded and easily perceived as dangerous enemies to fight against whether in Vietnam or Iraq.  

The media always presents their perspective of the enemy’s rationales not the enemy’s original audio. Bin Laden’s attack was blamed as islamic extremism and hating freedom. He never said any of this. He complained that America was killing innocent muslims, backing dictators and placing military bases in islamic holy cities. America continued to kill innocent muslims contributing to the rise of ISIS and strengthening of the Taliban. These groups were not anti-American for its liberalism but for its genocide on the muslim world for its own interest namely oil and money. The war in Afghanistan was elongated long after Bin Laden’s death to feed off military contractors. McCarthyism was a straight attack on communism. Invading Vietnam for its communist sentiment campaigned and manufactured by the Johnson administration for economic appeal. Saddam Hussain did not have WMD’s but the fear struck in the public garnering heavy support. Even the CIA was aware of this falsity and yet Bush argued and the media pushed it. For the sake of democracy it was worthwhile while committing the same mistakes at the expense of American citizens’ lives.      

The worst part about these malicious moves is the amount of lives lost due to their greedy and egotistical visions. Pearl harbour could have been avoided as well as all the soldiers killed in Vietnam and Afghanistan. Beyond American citizens, Middle Eastern citizens would be less threatened by the growing terrorism due to America’s superiority complex. Still, the media presents America as the key to salvaging peace. Anyone who opposes is a devilish fool who is a communist or a fascist. How dare you oppose democratising the world. There is a great defence of anti-war sentiments in the show Boston Legal. Despite their deep friendship Denny Crane struggles with Alan Shore’s anti-war opinions. To Denny, Alan is undemocratic and un-American. Being against the war is a monstrous attack on the US. Alan’s opposition has little to do with the lies that came out later. Such a position is considered crazy. Yet it is so true. Politicians play the same record over and over. The same pattern with the same lies. The people are duped into patriotic sympathy. It happened in WWII, Vietnam Iraq and Ukraine. 

War isn’t the only media mongering attempt to alienate and harass. Both Snowden and Assange are perceived as traitors to the country. The citizenry defend the government’s disgusting disastrous actions with little empathy. The media calls their traitorous moves as giving away classified intel when it was simply diluting governmental coverups. The irony is, the media is not the only one at fault. The people buy into their superiority complex. America is always right. America should go democratise the world. America has never done anything wrong. The only American issue is the culture war. The horizontal power grab between politics and race not the puppeteering from the government. Nothing wrong with the vertical power grab. America taking down terrorism awesome but American police terrible. America defends the world so ruffians can beat each other in the streets. If the government is doing it, it is okay not if a straight white male is. It is a total mess of values. An absolute trust in the governmental order. As long as it is bipartisan. If politicians agree they must be doing the people a favour instead of colluding to screw them over. 

Trump was a perfect example of media politicising random narratives for clicks and attention. Russiagate and January 6th have FBI written all over it and yet that is apparently too much to consider. Americans already are aware of the CIA’s infamous coups and it is too much to believe that the FBI could do the same. If media outlets are inviting FBI members to deny these claims as absurdity they are probably lying. Calling an FBI advisor to debunk a corruption theory on national television is not an expert but a ploy. The amount of censoring during covid on viruses and lockdowns were insidious but the media brought on its sole authenticator. Since science is apparently run by a single expert instead of debate. This is not beyond the pale to internalise. It is very real and the evidence is astronomical. The generally pushed version has little evidence. It has mere slogans and pushed agendas. Say Russian agent long enough and it becomes true. Say covid is from bats and people believe it. There is no evidence it is merely media speech.       

Veracity is absent. The media says it is true and people concede due to panic. Just because a president or a doctor says something does not make it true. Take it under advisement but do not conclude that it must be. It is good to be sceptical. Go get a second opinion. Yet the media feeds on fear. Manipulating clips to favour their agenda. Words like Russia and muslim make Americans cringe. Their reactionary impulse enables pervasive consent. Stop those bad men. Even if they were provoked. America sneakily creates the problems and then allows the public to react to brazen defence. Cultivating public paranoia to soothe elitist agendas. Playing politico-ideological stressors to embolden hate and division. Politicians forced lockdowns on citizens then didn’t follow their own rules only to be re-elected. Somehow either people forgave them or believed they were set up. Politicians wouldn’t lie. The media said that Pelosi was set up. It was a right wing attack. It is so easy to stoke division and motivate soldiers when political leanings are insufferable. Trump was the enemy because he was a jerk republican. He brokered two huge peace deals and aided the economy tremendously but no love because of manipulated media rhetoric.      

People are fault as well. Many left wingers do not have right wing friends and vice versa. Political leanings divide the country and apparent camaraderie. Many Americans believe their news program is unbiased and that the other is biased. Both are. MSNBC is liberal and FOX is conservative. Listen to both to get a full picture but they don’t do that. In fear they could be wrong. Unwilling to accept maybe they are in the wrong. The media only makes them feel better about themselves. Unable to see the whole truth. They blame it on republicans or capitalism, rich or white people. The problem is one’s own monolithic view. Hold people accountable and vote for representatives who will actually make changes. Do not let the media compel a position. A clearly biased position but naivety is so evident. The citizenry are too reactive. They need to be proactive to make change and seek responsibility. At the end of the day, it is the citizenry who are suffering for the country’s decisions. America’s billions aid to Ukraine is going somewhere else instead of the suffering countrymen rebounding from covid and homeless in the streets. A proactive priority of values. 

Focusing on America is easy since it is supposed to be the light onto the world and yet it is one of the most nefarious. The elemental cause of some of the most notorious consequences. Other democratic countries do the same. Democracy holds a certain naivety to the people. The media only further brands us-them paradigms as well as discolouring the obvious grey area into a dialectic of good versus evil. While the first shot may come from the enemy, things are not always as they appear. There are many ways to provoke an enemy. The media will lie for views and for continuity. Do not get sucked into their frame nor their deception. It is a propaganda tool for their own elitist discretion given the moguls own the business. Be careful who you trust and be sceptical of those who exaggerate.  

Manipulative Medication

By: Jonathan Seidel

Illich overmedication and add/adhd medication 

RFK Jr has garnered much admirations and criticism from his views on vaccines and medication. As a lawyer suing big corporations for years it is no doubt that he knows his stuff. Yet as a presidential candidate his positions have reached centre stage. His arguments of overmedication are met with pessimism. Is the rise of allergies unprecedented? Is there a problem with the drinking water? Is ADHD medication overdone? Or is he overreacting and this is scientific advancement? 

Illich argued half a century ago that modern medicine causes more harm than good. Causing illness rather than antidotes. Rightly so, advancements have been made to cease suffering but have also caused tenuous disasters. The problem of big Pharma and its profit margins are a deep source of medical inequality. Pharmaceuticals move through drugs like Apple does iPhones. The great hope of capitalist competition is a stalinist hierarchy with one group holding the the rest of the country by the balls. Charging them ridiculous rates for simple drugs like insulin. An easy drug to produce and provide. People don’t receive the medical assistance necessary because they cannot afford it. People are dying because they cannot pay to live. For all the hate of the communist ideology, the medical monopolisation is crudely fascistic in its tedious monistic singularity. There is no competition and the so called democratic government fails its mission and its citizens.

Yet beyond big pharma’s reach is the medicated excess they provide. Though it may be they’re bidding secretly or coincidentally marketing so many drugs to bring in enormous profit. The FDA and other governmental agencies suck their thumbs and simp their dignity to the medical overlords. Yet it is also the doctoral inefficacy that leads to this issue. Why are physicians proscribing medication to every child? Why is every child on adderall? Why are so many Americans allergic to peanut butter? What happened in the past decades? Did people get weaker or did drug companies get greedier? Mainly a move of better hygiene and higher purity enables dangerous foes to attack the weakest link namely children. This is a cause of human petrification not any villainy hiding in the shadows.

ADD/ADHD is a reduced stigmatisation. A stretch in the psychological disorders. Just as homosexuality and transgenderism have been conceived as disorders so to the former (yet can also be revoked in the long run as an ontological production). The presence of adderall is a testament to finding medication for those impaired. They are diseased and need to be cared for. Mental diseases have always been overlooked. Men’s mental health only became relevant in the 90s and is still undeveloped and stigmatised. Men are strong emotionless hallow trunks. It is if anything to admit emotions let alone cry publicly. Research would have you believe it is genetic. A part of human nature only recently accepted. Playing on the mental health insecurities but then again the research is done by big pharma. How trustworthy is the profit-centred lobbying billionaire. 

Is there any truth to this? There are predictions. While pointing to the covid debacle may place me in hot water. People will call me a anti-vaxxer for even questioning the legitimacy and flip flopping obvious political ploy of the vaccinations. The it should not be named lab leak and gain of function origin sponsored illegally by Fauci. Yet all that is conspiracy. Fauci said you would try to burn him at the stake. The man who flip flopped so much feeding false details to the media base. Whose politicians legislated by failed to abide by their own orders. Oh and quadrupled down on how many vaccines were necessary because the science changes but yet won’t debate it because it is a fact. Well apparently not if you keep changing it. Newton would disagree with such dubious jargon. Covid was handled so improperly with so much deception and yet still cannot be honest with the mistakes. 

Tuskegee was a single bad moment in American history. It was the one time, the government experimented on people. The one time government lied and deceived the public. Dr. Redfied of the CDC is an idiot apparently. It is only a conspiracy if the public is duped into believing the matrix. Big pharma that has helped no one and politicians who openly lie are telling the truth on national television. They published their findings on the morning news cause CNN fact checks the medical analysis. None of the vaccines are compromised. People presenting sickness following vaccination are lying. They are conspirators out to destroy democracy. Do not listen to their lies. They are commies and trumpers. They hate Joe Biden and love Putin or maybe they are poor democratic black folk who do not trust the government.

Purdue pharma is single handedly the culprit behind the opioid crisis. Out for profit they pushed the drug to market. Convcinging doctors it was the correct manner. Only the other year were they convicted. OxyContin killed thousands while approved by the FDA. The obvious government failure in their taxpayer dollars wasted and compensated with American deaths due to lacking oversight. While the CIA played their own role in the cocane crisis, their corruption is evident. While big pharma is the agency to provide adequate medical care, the CIA’s is to fuck things up. It was an intentional effort of the Purdue pharma to make money and they killed people for it. Cash for death. Oh great democracy. The DEA and pharma in cahoots. Lobbyists able to persuade congress away from actually saving Americans. An elitist playbook that kills the average citizen.

The government has been complicit in the drug war. It calls the war on drugs and yet the current president is responsible for incarcerating a germination of black people for an ounce of weed. His son got off easy because daddy was important. A hypocrite to the core. Flooding harsh neighbourhoods with drugs and then ironically jailing those who touched it. Not too shabby for an inside job. They need to be more stoic. Resist the drug temptation. Well when its flooded the neighbourhood intentionally to incarcerate, it will happen one way or another. The CIA corrupted black communities with crack. There’s a new Netflix doc about it. The CIA are the good guys who topple regimes and boost up dictators. Anything for America. Even if its to dismantle coloured communities. Racism much? 

Where is the disease mongering? Halitosis, a synonym for bad breath, was conceived in the 1920s as a pathology. A crisis emerged that people were sick and could be cured by Listerine. A normative condition heightens to hysteria for marketing purposes and profit. Exaggerating simple conditions to the absolute maniacal. While erectile dysfunction is the real deal, more context is necessary. The extensive viagra commercials blow the problem out of proportion as if it’s an epidemic. Showing a forty year old man as a typical patient. Though the tallying study undermined its own image with less than 3% struggling. The deceptive advertisements were funded by the manufacturer for viagra, Pfizer. The data is manipulated by the drug creator to scare the public into overestimating their own conditions and placing them in further harm while making the drug company money. It is not so much the lies insofar as the side effects. 

Everyone has extra time for test taking. Everyone is on adderall or ritalin. Apparently, nobody can concentrate anymore. This cannot be a revelational revolution. There are too many subjects. The technological promiscuity allies with lax parenting. Yet it is a problem significant to America. The grand narratives to justify are global but the problem is national. Only America has these ridiculous rates. Young children pre-puberty are placed on life altering extensive side effective drugs. They aren’t warned. Simply told, their kid suffers from ADHD and must be medicated for his sake. These powerful drugs are assigned to even those who do not meet the requirements of ADHD. Doctors proscribed with little afterthought. Drug companies shoved past the FDA’s nose. Too busy playing Mario Cart to notice. Established professionals in the psych community deny the epidemic. The CDC is lying. Correct about covid, wrong about ADHD. Only 5% safer but 15% receive and its way up since the last census. It is not the capitalist that is the problem but the fascistic elements that prevent proper competition and oversight. 

Media smearing conspiracy tropes of long discredited claims by pharmaceutical specialists does not ring authenticity in my ear. What does the conspiracist have except an inkling of truth. Scientists showing up on MSNBC to discredit to calm liberal hysteria is no way of honouring the truth. Just as the climate craziness is senile. Quantity over quality apparently emerges victorious. 100 bad scientists pale in comparison to 1 good scientist. It is the prodigy, the Newtons, the Einsteins not the other random folk that nobody remembers. Bad science is bad science no matter how many people say it. Elijah stood alone against hundreds of Baal prophets, God lit his on fire. The false prophets were left standing with their dicks out. Everyone recognised Elijah was correct and then the next day planned to assassinate him. Truth does not go the right way when political hegemony is controlled by a devilish queen. 

It is worth investigating the rise of allergies. Failing to even properly investigate the disease mongering facilities is a crime. Making up bullshit just to appease the public is direly unstable. It works on the meek. Those who fall into the herd mentality. They just fall in line desiring the answer to be a natural disaster instead of a concocted plague. Unlike the Middle Ages, this is not a plague by the enemy but our faults. Trusting authority too much. The Leviathan is a danger. It repeatedly lies and deceives. It fails to even provide basic homeostasis. Branding itself a democracy without following its principles. Where is the competition? Where is the market supply and demand? Where is the separation between industry and state? No. It has gone full blown fascistic. Private companies monopolise and government agencies twiddle their thumbs praying to these paranoid mortals as some fake Jesus. No backbone and no heart, just a manipulative useless piece of junk.

Expert Innuendos

By: Jonathan Seidel

Rejecting complexity: trolling intellectual the case of of Neil deGrasse Tyson on the titanic 

Neil deGrasse Tyson mentioned on a recent Joe Rogan podcast he received hate comments after commenting on the scientific accuracy of movies. Recently, he made a comment about the titanic concerning the star’s alignment and people were up in arms. Trolling him endlessly with bashing insults. This part of an ideological hold that cannot be breached. Arguing against an expert out of spite is a conscious choice to be ignorant and angry instead of humble and correct. 

There is an immense amount of doctrinal conformity. So hellbent on a specified version of their account any alternative is blatantly rejected, So hung up on their side of things otherness is blasphemous. This childish attitude is fair game to a friend but to an expert is dubious. It is a student rebelling against the teacher. Claiming he knows better. While in deGrasse Tyson’s case it was enjoying ignorance over knowledge. There is an aspect of trying to one up those more educated than you. To try to usurp their authority over you. A jealous youth with listening problems. Lesser knowledgeable people making unintuitive arguments to save face against the other side. Ignoring for the sake of their dignity. Blurting their belief and then storming off cowardly with tails between their legs.

Viewers may rightfully say thank you deGrasse Tyson but we do not care. The negative reaction was an attack on his mentorship. His education was being banned. It was a reboot of Galileo’s trial. Telling the biblical stories with correct science were silenced and rejected for offering an alternative to their traditional model. The level of arrogance and pettiness to maintain a status quo. deGrasse Tyson wasn’t challenging an institution but a film’s error. Facts are important. When they are muddled for convenience it creates a pattern where truth is irrelevant. Take the example of the Martian. If a scientist did not disprove it people may believe it to be true. When fables are pursued as factual, it undermines their authenticity.

Historical documentaries are a better example. The show vikings was misconstrued in its overemphasis on nordic plundering. The narrative indicated that Christians were good pure people and vikings violent raiders. If a historian does not speak out, people will take it at face value. Even with a bit of scepticism and recognition of exaggeration the embellishment cannot be properly exposed if no one speaks up. Viewers were to believe and for the sake of integrity there is reason to uphold the truth no matter what. Embellishment in any era is problematic. If experts are not trolling to ensure facts are represented that cinema will become the beacon of truth to a harsh degree. 

Persistent expert rebuttal reminds viewers that cinema though photographically reflective is a director’s perspective. It does not necessarily state the truth. Films tell partial truths and must be held accountable for that. People should know the truth and should crave it. Know to be sceptical and do more research. Much of the narrative has parcels of accuracy but the details are shifted to fit an agenda. The latter must be interrogated. It is not one movie to worry about but the idea behind cinematic fact. Perceiving cinema with more truth only heightens its ability to influence the viewer. To project an agenda consuming the viewer’s identity. It is a dangerous art that if not responded correctly could steal his soul.

Titanic may not be a pivotal example but it holds accountable the mistake. The movie experience is an aspect but not the entire film. The historical account means something as well. Messing with it out of ignorance or agenda seeking is trivial. Either it’s laziness or ideological. Both are negative. There is also an educational element in pointing this out. Take the movie Ted. Though a comedy about a teddybear coming to life, deGrasse Tyson was approached how this could occur. The script followed his answer. This is a minor point to the comedic faculty of the film but accuracy and honesty are compelling themes to storytelling. A lie loses its integrity and audience commitment. It is about transparency and striving to be right. 

If you cannot care about the little things why will you care about the big things. Galileo is a perfect example where deGrasse Tyson-ed to the premodern twitter—the church and they responded harshly to his comments. People refused to step away from their dogmatic beliefs. It is a perpetuated pattern of sheer ignorance and stubborn arrogance.  

Visual Clues

By: Jonathan Seidel

Ancient societies were built on oral foundations. The lack of written excess bolstered an oral society. Today much of our society is written. Yet oral remnants still remain. Our society is no longer nor ever written entirely. Even if society is legalised built on a constitutional bedrock, it does change the oral parameters persistent as the core and daily methodology.

Orality falls under the experiential motif split into two categories verbal and visual. For all human history orality has been the cultural centre of society. Orality is best described as verbal communication. Parables and hymns were the original resource of communication. Yet orality has always been at the centre of education. Despite textbooks filled with the history of information, we still have schools with teachers as well as online content. Education continues to be verbal even when there is apparent simpler ways of learning. Yet this is not about being stuck in the past. It is about teaching on a level. A book only provides the basic information. It provides formulas and definitions. It rarely leads tangentially out of context. A teacher amasses an array of knowledge that can be fluidly nurtured in the student. The student does not only read but asks questions from an elder perspective. From one who has read more than them. Someone who specialises in the field. The plain words in the textbook are not always clear to the student. The reader may require a deeper analysis that a teacher with the extensive vocabulary and interpersonal skills can produce. 

Humans talk everyday. We communicate with one another on the basic of oral trajectory. To attain info we discuss and converse. There is no book for dialogue. It is an event of fluid vocality. The intentionality of oral communication is its unsubstantiated unknown future. Discussions begin and where they lead is for time to tell. Yet they are informative. Whether the information is surface or deep, it is still knowledge received. Verbalism is methodical but also coincidental. We talk to others with a goal in mind but that which we desire is not achieved through the exact means we plan. Sometimes it is but once the words leave the lips all is possible. Orality has no rules. Standards or manners are relevant but no embedded rules. One can choose to respond or not. Fundamentally, orality is a mixture of an intent that has an undisclosed next step. The flow of consciousness becomes ever automatic in extensive conversation. It becomes intuitive to react by engaging the other. 

Verbal orality has been misused. Politics has corrupted media. It is a free for all who can brainwash the most people. Faces on a monitor exclaim such and such occurred and the horror of their inaccuracies has hit a new low. Lying news anchors, politicians, gurus. Whomever, it is an individual contest for self elevation. Who couldn’t have seen this coming. With people clinging for a community, people would manipulate others for their own gain. The technological word does not work in print no more. Even print can’t be trusted. History is written by the victor, politics is a sham. The matrix is real and we are in the thick of it. Everything is hardcore relative. They hypocritical disrespect is astonishing. An oral community transcends the written bounds to be united by word. Connected on a higher existential level. This is the greatest lost. To feel connected. To feel appreciated. Then to be stabbed in the back. To be lied to. To be fooled. Orality has bee weaponised to feed off the weaklings. Manipulating the public with oral messages when the anchor or president is reading off of a teleprompter. A way of overpowering those gullible enough to accept the nonsense soothing from their lips.

When the verbal faculty is misconstrued the visual one also becomes abandoned. Mimicking is a byproduct of visualisation of a verbal and non-verbal act. Some procedures are innate replicas. The classic monkey see, monkey do. No verbal exchange is necessary. Yet much of all else requires verbal communication. Especially when an imitation is a gross misappropriation. Tweaks need to be made to reconcile imprecise action. Perfect copies are negligent and communication fixes the adequacies. Verbal is directed to the visual. The senses are linked but does not mean a blind man will not perfect the motion but his personal knowledge is mitigated by absent sight. The experiential is oral. The blind man can also partake in the oral community. The deaf man as well. Though sign language is verbal communication even without vocality. Its use of words or gestures to subjects is verbal in nature. The oral community is embedded in a transitionary model of linkage. It speaks to the relative cultural reception of the event. Communication is not just floating words but received criteria. Internalised info is marked by its absorption of knowledge and response accuracy. 

If the verbal is untrustworthy then the visual is also distorted. Sight is hypnotised with propaganda content to sway public perception. The visual cannot be trusted as imagery is weaponised to clown the public. The oral community is communicative in its separate identity. It is polarising the masses into identical voices speaking past one another. Verbalism is a critical aspect of existential connection. Within the conversation an encounter is struck. The auditory must differentiate the truth sayers  and false deniers. In an oral makeup there is an experiential tie to the communal gathering. A trust between people. An oral society relies on its information gurus. Those with resources are they who have information to provide. This is personal knowledge to be shared with the public but they hide it. They hold it close to their chests. They spew jargon to gain mass hysteria in their product. For people to give them a higher purpose in the institutions. A magician never reveals their secrets. Follow me and I’ll teach them to you, they say. I will have your back among other fake prophecies.                 

Visual apprehension is discoloured by its empirical disinterest. Can we really trust what we see? This is no Cartesian miscalculation. While our eyes honestly can make out clear images, the media plays tricks on our delusions. We are presented with elusive fascination that mildly corresponds to the basis of realistic aura. The disrespectful imaginative news-bites cradled in swift segments propels the sheerest of propaganda. Reality is fractured into minuscule hyperbole. Promised aspirations shrouded in unimaginable arrogance. Speaking in sermonic hymns engulfing the mass hysteria. Clever one-liners arousing the cerebral cortex. Orality is today deceptive and mysterious. A medieval clerical defiance of hellish science. With little uptake for moral adherence, there is little holding anyone to companionship. Subtle alterations in the visual representation by coding the image with verbal abuse. Verbal assault is not violent offence but deceptive malice. A forger expense of scenic inquisition. 

Deviance is the enemy of cohesion. It builds a false reality. Pummelled into the nervous centre of scandalous attraction. The communicative identity is fallacious. It is not the whole truth but a slice. Truths are mixed with falsities. Much journalism is intentionally skewed ideologically, there is clear ignorance to the contrary. Ideological preservation is the highest priority. Anything that impedes on its stability will feel the wrath of the reactionary delay. Blinded by motives, the full truth is missed. Orality laced with prudent accessories seduces obscurity. Communication is muddled if ears are closed or if speech is deliberate. The goal is to produce followers not independent minds. To flourish in uniform potentiality.